Enzo Maresca's tactical philosophy is coming under increasing scrutiny as Chelsea’s performances continue to decline, raising concerns over his rigid style of play and ability to adapt.
Chelsea’s promising start to the season is beginning to unravel, with Enzo Maresca’s tactical approach drawing criticism as results deteriorate. While the Italian was initially praised for stabilising the squad, his possession-based system is now being questioned, with fans frustrated by slow, predictable football that lacks attacking penetration.
A stark contrast has emerged between Chelsea’s early-season form and their current struggles, with some suggesting that the team's early success was more a continuation of Mauricio Pochettino’s chaotic but effective counter-attacking approach rather than Maresca’s structured system. The numbers back this up—despite controlling possession, Chelsea have failed to create clear-cut chances, managing just one shot on target across two games against Brighton.
Maresca’s lack of a plan B is a growing concern, as is his apparent struggle to motivate players. Chelsea’s dressing room unrest and declining fan support could signal further trouble ahead. However, some argue that the club’s structural issues run deeper than the head coach, with recruitment failures and a lack of leadership on the pitch playing a significant role in their struggles.
If Maresca is to succeed at Chelsea, he must find a way to make his philosophy effective or show greater adaptability. Otherwise, history suggests the club could soon be searching for yet another manager.
