Enzo Maresca’s Chelsea started the season with promise, but recent results have exposed significant flaws in their approach. The team’s attempt to dominate possession has not translated into attacking efficiency, raising concerns that they are neutralising their own strengths. As Chelsea struggle to control matches, some argue that embracing a more chaotic, counter-attacking style could unlock the full potential of their young squad.
Chelsea’s recent decline in form has reignited debate over whether Enzo Maresca’s tactical philosophy is the right fit for the squad. Despite dominating possession, Chelsea’s attacking play has suffered, as shown in their 3-0 defeat to Brighton where they failed to register a shot on target.
The Athletic’s podcast discussion highlights how Chelsea’s best performances this season have come in transition, using the speed and creativity of players like Cole Palmer and Nicolas Jackson. However, Maresca appears committed to a more controlled, possession-based style, similar to Pep Guardiola’s Manchester City—despite the vast difference in player experience.
The discussion draws parallels with Brendan Rodgers at Liverpool, who initially insisted on slow, patient football before adapting to his squad’s strengths. Some believe Maresca may need to follow a similar path, allowing Chelsea’s young attackers to play with more freedom rather than forcing them into a rigid system that doesn’t suit their skill set.
